According to The Atlantic magazine, "Walter Johnson takes the measure" of slavery:
As those people passed through the trade, representing something close to half a billion dollars in property, they spread wealth wherever they went. Much of the capital that funded the traders' speculations had been borrowed from banks and had to be repaid with interest, and all of it had to be moved through commission-taking factorage houses and bills of exchange back and forth between the eastern seaboard and the emerging Southwest.
And the slaves in whose bodies that money congealed as it moved south had to be transported, housed, clothed, fed, and cared for during the one to three months it took to sell them. Some of them were insured in transit, some few others covered by life insurance. Their sales had to be notarized and their sellers taxed. Those hundreds of thousands of people were revenue to the cities and states where they were sold, and profits in the pockets of landlords, provisioners, physicians, and insurance agents long before they were sold. The most recent estimate of the size of this ancillary economy is 13.5 percent of the price per person-tens of millions of dollars over the course of the antebellum period.
There's a point in there, though I can't imagine what.
Not "whether you're red, green, blue, or purple, we're all the same."
But the opposite of that.
Something about economics making us different.
Taboo topic - no ifs, ands, or buts about it.
Some say to take it up with the people who freed the slaves.
They'll understand.
Word is they've been wondering what's going on lately.
We're like "You tell me."
Still no answer back yet,...
