Ready! Aim! Fire Everybody Associated With This Crap!

Follow me, sharp shooters:

A few days ago, Glenn Reynolds' message was clear:

"I think the GOP can win even by losing,…"

But today's message is linked to JIM TYNEN:

Why the Republicans Can’t Give Up Now. 

“They would be like Obama and his red line in Syria. They have drawn a red line; to go back is to look feckless and weak. And, worse, ridiculous. Whether the time is right, etc., is irrelevant. Folding would give them no credit; their only recourse is to win. And victory is closer than ever.”

So, are Tynen and I right - winning is still "winning" - and Glenn's experimenting with Charlie Sheen's Tiger Blood? 

Drudge has got Sarah Palin screaming, Bomb's Away!" 

But AP's got Rand Paul admitting to her it's all a delusion.

What to do?

Well, who's right is the wrong question - it's a losing campaign to begin with - so we at least need a lesson for the rest of us.

I'll give it to you.

Get some leaders from this century:

Because, when you're as confused as Glenn and Sarah, bringing down a moose - and bringing down a elephant - are pretty much the same operation,...

 

Instapundit: A Little Too Interested In How To Kill Blacks On The Left And Not Enough On How To Stop The Killing

Sigh. Another day, another load of bullshit from Glenn Reynolds.

I just looked over and what's Instapundit got on the Washington shooter?

Well, since he wanted to make sure we knew the guy wasn't a "Texan" yesterday, today we have to know the (apparently black) guy liked the black president.

I know - you're shocked - me too.

There's also a lot of blather about the AR-15, and how the media got the gun wrong, blah, blah, blah.

But - lo and behold - check out what DRUDGE is linking to, today, now that the information stream is settling:

  Navy Yard shooter Aaron Alexis was 'not happy with America,' friend says

Really? Didn't I say, yesterday, "the real 'narrative' here is how much Americans are learning to hate each other"? 

Or how about this from Drudge:

Some saw the tragedy as an opportunity to publicly air some difficult topics that Buddhists most often discuss only among themselves. Is the peaceful Buddhist an illusion? Do Buddhists and Buddhist temples deal directly enough with the topic of mental illness? And, in fact, might Buddhism hold a special attraction for people who are mentally ill? 

“As Buddhism has spread in the West, it has put forth and maintained an image of being a peaceful religion,” Buddhist ethicist Justin Whitaker, author of the American Buddhist Perspective blog, wrote Tuesday. “This is a myth.” 

Buddhism can seem particularly appealing to “mentally unbalanced people seeking to right the ship of their lives, to self-medicate, to curb their impulses, or to give them a firmer grip on reality,” Clark Strand, a contributing editor to the Buddhist publication Tricycle magazine and a former Zen monk, said in an interview.

I've been telling you that, in one form or another, for some time, too.

So once again it's happened - just like with music:

Based solely on watching the "spiritual" machinations of my country - I'm nailing another shooting down, but without a word (or link) from conservatism's indispensable man. The NewAge guy who's always pushing yoga, meditation, and outright quackery.

It's totally chickenshit.

Chickenshit to me and both of our readers - As I wrote once before, under these identical circumstances:

When it comes to NewAge, Law Professors blogging, and sorting this nation out, "Today's Intellectual Class Couldn't Catch A Cold"...

Seriously - With A Name Like "Drudge" - You Can't Say You Didn't Ever Understand What You've Been Getting

Does anybody else remember, a couple of weeks ago, when I wrote this headline? 

  Matt Drudge Is Now Using White Folks 

As Total Chumps

Well, The New Republic did a little racial research-type number crunching, and discovered an amazing thing: 

  Matt Drudge Is Now Using White Folks 

As Total Chumps

I'm giving it time:

White folks will figure out who their real friends are one day,...

 

The Worst Thing A Black Conservative Can Be Is Black

Listen to Glenn Reynolds, thinking they've done something big, and like anybody gives a damn:

“DRUDGE BRINGS THE SMACK”

Oh SNAP! Somebody DOES give a damn! Like a fan of his who seems to have the partisan depth of a fish tank:

“AprilApple said... 

*burp*

 

Black republicans are non-persons. 

August 28, 2013 at 7:38 PM”

Oh, Heavens! You mean it's happening amongst Democrats, too! Somebody make it stop! Yeah - blacks are non-persons, especially with the likes of those two, only trotted out when they have a point to make, usually benefitting themselves. (I don't even know who this black senator is so, clearly, making him known - before now - has been the Right's top priority, correct?) And, of course, they now want we "non-persons" to do what they won't, and wade into a black mob and start causing trouble. You know, like their hero, Allen West, would do if he was there:

“If yesterday’s luncheon commemorating the 50th anniversary of the March on Washington is any indication, it’s a version of traditional black conservatism, with its emphasis on community building and uplift. 

Organized by the Republican National Committee, this event was both a celebration of Martin Luther King Jr.’s legacy, and a showcase for black Republicanism. The large majority of the attendees were African-American, and they included former congressman Allen West, T.W. Shannon (speaker of the Oklahoma House of Representatives), Alveda King (niece of Martin Luther King Jr.), and a large variety of party members and activists. 

Figures like West have made themselves famous by decrying the 'Democratic plantation' and attacking other African-Americans for their partisan affiliation, but that rhetoric was absent from the program.”

Hmmm. West seemed to have lost his nerve or something. Somehow - whether it's Glenn Reynolds or his readers and associates - I don't think that's the kind of "speaking truth to power" they had in mind.

I mean, I know from experience, they definitely don't appreciate it when they're the power being spoken to - well, they appreciate whatever means are at their disposal to shut it down (like their challengers are black senators!) - but they don't appreciate being put on the spot for THEIR nonsense.

Here's a few articles I found yesterday that Ol' Glenn Boy isn't informing anybody of, or trying to start any problems around, as he attempts to instigate some black-on-somebody violence, or something, elsewhere:

25 African Americans Denied Service At Restaurant Because White Patrons Felt Threatened By Them

When Your (Brown) Body is a (White) Wonderland 

(BTW - I have NEVER seen an article about this problem going the other way - and I never will on Instapundit. "21st Century Relationships", anybody?)

Albert Einstein Called Racism “A Disease of White People” in His Little-Known Fight for Civil Rights

Listen To An Unearthed Martin Luther King Jr. Recording You've Never Heard

White People Know More About Racism Than Any Of Us

Dear Twerk Thieves and Ratchet Robbers

None of which are worth the time of Glenn Reynolds, The Great White Informer, because he doesn't have an interest in telling us anything about being black while I know a lot about being white. (7 out of 8 people I see a day are white.) I see Reynolds' bullshit every day, and not even a third of what he's talking about holds any relevance for me, what-so-ever.

Which figures, considering,...

 

I'm Trembling As I Compose This (I Need To Be Held,...)

Look - we can fix this race thing. We've just gotta prepare! Like, whenever minorities get invited to appear on TV and yell, "Y'all's CRAZY!" have a scrolling translation for white folks ready, like this:

"If America’s bipartisan establishment is agreed on something, you can be pretty sure it will be a disaster. That is my reluctant conclusion, after nearly three decades of involvement in politics and journalism, in Washington and New York. 

I say 'reluctant' because I am not a populist by temperament. I respect academic training as well as expertise based on personal experience. I think that institutions are, or should be, less likely to make mistakes than individuals. I detest people who pose as “contrarians” for the sake of controversy. I would happily be an establishmentarian, if there were a U.S. establishment worth belonging to. 

But the track record of what passes for the bipartisan elite in the U.S. in the last generation has been pretty poor. Instead of sober, dispassionate analysis of long-run trends, considered from the perspective of the nonpartisan national interest, the conventional wisdom among America’s movers and shakers has consisted of one hysterical fad after another."

See? Huh? Viola! I'd go from an "Angry Black Man" to a guy who doesn't waste a lot of words.

BTW - if the networks ever decide to call me - better amend that translation to say it's no accident the NewAger's favorite question is "What are you afraid of?"

What's an accident is, whatever we fear, we can find out - fast - at The Drudge Report. 

I'm never getting on TV, am I?