Showing posts with label dr. helen. Show all posts
Showing posts with label dr. helen. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 21, 2013

Working On Women Is A Start (Now - About The "Men")


Gee, Crack, why do you attack those fine feminists, Ann and Meade Althouse, so often? Oh, I don't know - let a review of Dr. Helen Smith's Men On Strike, Glenn Reynolds' wife's book, explain it:
How did we get to this point? Among other causes, Smith points to a feminist movement that went from fighting for equality for women to advocating laws to privilege women at men’s expense. She characterizes men who collude in perpetuating this system as “White Knights” who instinctively support policies purporting to protect the “weaker sex,” and as “Uncle Tims” — her play on the iconic “Uncle Tom” character — who for their own gain embrace the noxious notion that men are inherently flawed and need to be constrained.

They do it "for their own gain" - that's our Meade! (He ain't known in Althouse circles as a "grifter" for nothing,...) But no mention of the unrelenting gay shit? Or the hypocrite men, like Reynolds, who attack feminism while giving feminists a platform?


We're definitely not getting comprehensive yet,...
 

Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Men Without Game Get Caught Like This All-The-Time


Here's another bit of wisdom, courtesy of that guardian of manliness, Glenn Reynolds, again (Am I the only person who actually reads him, or the only one noticing what he promotes?) This time he's pumping "7 Ways to End a Toxic Relationship" - if you're a young man, reading Reynolds, live and learn:
"If you're in a toxic relationship, you probably know you want to get out. But you feel stuck, paralyzed, and nagged by doubts. You might cling to hope that he could change."

"He"? Where'd the word "he" come from? Can't "toxic relationships" go either way? Then why the gender targeting language? Oh yeah - because Glenn's wife wrote a book. That he's read. But didn't understand. So he promotes the opposite. Leader of the blogosphere, mind you. Tea Party hero, this guy. Law professor. Brilliant as a booger. How about this one:
"7. You don't owe anyone any explanations. You don't owe your family, friends, children, or even your partner justification that satisfies them as to why you want to leave."

Brilliant - thanks, Glenn. 


Considering how everybody helps out in a relationship, you - that would be the woman - don't owe anybody anything when your narcissism grows to the level of man-eating beast. That's what conservatives are fighting for, correct? Must be - Glenn's promoting it and he's the Big Dawg.


I don't know about his home life but, as far as his blog, he's practically our Anthony Weiner,...
 

Can Somebody Explain Hypocrisy To Glenn Reynolds?


So, the conservative blogosphere is showing what "we're" all about - again:

They're having a grand time, at the expense of an ADMITTED manic-depressive male feminist having a break-down, because - while off his meds and in a manic state - he'd come clean about "using sex and charm and whiteness" to scam his readers.


I got that link from Glenn Reynolds' blog. Here's what Glenn wrote about it:
"Chicks just dig jerks, especially if they pretend to have the right gender politics."

Very observant. Keep in mind, Glenn's married to a woman who writes about gender politics and the unfairness of society to men. Glenn's even been ferociously promoting her book.


Meanwhile, at the same time, he also regularly promotes a female feminist - but one known for having almost regularly-scheduled and extremely-alienating public breakdowns - and who's likewise known for "using sex and charm and whiteness" to scam her readers.

But she's another law professor who refuses to admit anything - evidence be damned.

Glenn's never turned the screws on her like he and his friends have done a manic depressive male.

It should be pointed out that Ann Althouse, too, is getting her kicks at the guy. 


Which raises some obvious questions:


Is Reynolds such a jerk he hasn't even read his own wife's book?


Or is he just too stupid to understand it?